There was an agenda between the Catholic Church and the Muslims. This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience onourwebsite. They seem completely ignorant to the fact that the Arab Muslim has been enslaving them since the 7th century. A recent study published in the journal Nature puts forward an intriguing alternative to existing theories about human evolution, suggesting that Homo sapiens Its definitely not proven in the same way as the oxygen theory of combustion or the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It cant be. If you claim otherwise, feel free to write up your evidence, submit for peer review, and collect your multiple Nobel Prizes. But no one talks about it. katrin bennhold. The Out of Africa hypothesis is a model for the origin and dispersal of modern humans. Its really disgusting. Please check this https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25444, Your email address will not be published. Sometimes the past dies, and opens doors to new discovery. Already it was scientifically concluded that Australian Aboriginals did not descend from Africans. Archaeologists interested in the link between the earliest members of the genus Homo and modern humans often study the migration patterns of Homo sapiens and their closest relatives to refine our evolutionary tree. Taken Feb 8 2002. Extensive research and excavating would have to be done to disprove the OOA Theory. Learn how to educate people on what you know rather than just rambling clumsily. The Out of Africa hypothesis is regarded as the most probable explanation for modern humans come from, but this wasn't always the case. The black Africans who converted from Voodoo to Islam? So anyway the process is mostly legit, and the only ones that the public had to question are theories which stand to benefit a certain someone, like the infamous food pyramid. the facial structure? No one ever says a scientific theory is a fact. God likes round things and there are 7 days in a week. I personally have had quite enough with the ALL for me but none for thee bull crap. katrin bennhold. Evolution is a theory or idea based on observation not fact. Whats this about discovering motivation? Is it not clear that many hominids, if stressed, and likely unstressed too, looked at the hill and wondered what was over there? If you make a mistake in writing out your math during a test and you truly want to get a 100% score, you can always skip and go back, but in the end you will try to fix that mistake. Ego. Blacks assisted British slave traders to round up less desirable blacks; Muslim soldiers enslaved whites during the Crusades, Poll Pot enslaved millions of his own people, Stalin systematically starvedulluons in the Ukraine, etcc etc. The amount of environmental factors that can influence brain health and cognitive development ensures that their true intellectual capacity isnt being measured. You made the argument for science as a religion.. Science is none of those things. So the multiregional model is still a contender suggesting that our African ancestors did migrate and hybridize with local archaic humans in different regions in the world, though the genetic implications are likely to be minimal. We are said to originate from the SAN in Africa. However, this is hotly debated. Kept them in slave pens, dungeons in the castles that White folks built, or a crude hole dug in the ground. Caucasian. Homo ergaster (or African Homo erectus) may have been the first human species to leave Africa. (Duh.). Theres nothing wrong in making a mistake because we have made mistakes before. And what they found was that, in Africa, there was a greater diversity in the mitochondrial DNA than there was outside. Well, I do. Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window), Oldest human fossil found outside of Africa throws popular theory into doubt. Thats the most basic element of science. You know why? Personally, I dont think you laughter, belittling tone, and hyperbole strengthen your argument. This work by SITNBoston is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. All Rights Reserved. Evidence from a genetic study indicates an expansion out of Africa about 1.9 million years ago and gene flow occurring between Asian and African populations by 1.5 million years ago. Period. A scientist would still look into it, I think your ego took over, mister. Although the racial tones have now been thoroughly discredited and are regarded as a little more than a bygone myth, there are still people who rely on them today. With everything I have learned (if you dont mind my opinion, and many English typing errors) I have concluded that many people and scientists have massive egos! So. Further this Scientific Fact can be duplicated and is a postulation in modernity. A black scientist created us. The fossil suggests that modern-day humans were exploring regions outside of Africa more than 55,000 years earlier than previously thought. But it is true. Key Takeaways. The accepted theory about the evolution and migration of different human races of different colors and migration is wrong. Different needs in a different world than the one in which we currently live produced different solutions and results from what are likely cognitive capacities equaling or even surpassing our own. WebThe overall learning targets for this activity are: 1. to identify humanity's place of origin. Ideas associated with this work regarded humans as made up of discrete races with independent origins that emerged at different times. I mean really! Can you believe that? The scientist openly welcomes change, as it aids in fixing the gaps of their knowledge. The slave trade. WebThe origin of humans in Africa was famously proposed in the 19th century by Charles Darwin. These hominins may have been either australopithicines or, more likely, an unknown species of Homo, similar in appearance to Homo habilis. Its an agenda. Hey guys! Theories regarding human origins are not scientific theories and should be considered as little more than speculation. I still cant stop thinking about Dr Watson. What I saw in America and what I saw in Egypt, looked very similar. Even though the suggestion of a nuclear war being waged 8-10K years ago clear doesnt conform to the technological capabilities outlined in our established model of human history, the formation of this glass is consistent with what is found at nuclear test sites. WebThe Out of Africa hypothesis, the theory of a recent unique African origin for the modern human species, was supported by early interpretations of the variation of mtDNA (Cann, Theyre fallible humans, emotionally stubborn and territorial. Its when you try to convince yourself that you havent made a mistake is where you fail to learn. The real problem lies in the representation that science and media often presents itself: as the ultimate, unchallengeable, emperor of the modern world and all truth; and that science knows best and everyone else should shut up. Fraud you say? We know this because of DNA analyses. Join us, volunteer and be a part of our journey of discovery! Even Einstein had his flaws, but dont ever bet against him. Thats correct, the scientific method is rife with NEW discoveries, where scientists must alter their opinions. Which is a case of severe rickets. Darwin predicted that Africa would be the source for the evolution of humanity. However, an alternate theory proposes that hominins migrated out of Africa before Homo ergaster evolved, possibly about 2 million years ago, prior to the earliest dates of Homo erectus in Asia. In particular, observations made in the 1970s suggested that fossils phenotypically associated with humans were found in Africa earlier than anywhere else, which must have meant modern humans emerged from there. Are you saying it *could* be a fraud? This competing explanation agrees with the Out of Africa idea that Africa represents the site of our origins, but it holds that humans evolved through a combination of adaptation as well as gene flow (interbreeding) between themselves and the now-extinct archaic humans in different regions. How about Nebraska man, who was magically discovered using a pigs tooth? Why should we believe anything these modern day quacks and frauds say? I enjoy reading about philosophy, and I admire that in science you must question everything! Archaeologists Have Used AI To Find A Way, A Psychic Was Once Awarded Nearly $1 Million After A CAT Scan Made Her Powers Vanish, Organs Have Been Frozen, Thawed, And Transplanted For The First Time, Exploding Whale Caught On Camera As Boat Pulls Up To Decaying Carcass, New Zealand Is In Big Trouble, According To Scientists, Do You Need To Wash Rice Before Cooking? Right or wrong, if you dont sound competent, no one will even look twice at what you have to say. How did those African Kingdoms become wealthy? Before they could spread out of Africa, our ancestors needed to develop physical and mental capabilities that would enable them to survive in these harsh environments where food and fresh water were highly seasonal resources. The Florida Bog people. Our ancestors have been using tools for many millions of years. These probably represent populations that intermittently occupied the region and it is unlikely that there was direct evolutionary continuity between the Misliya and later Skhul/Qafzeh peoples. The unwise say they know everything, but the wise say they know nothing. But a study so innocent, about where humans came through, needs only to be checked for sloppiness and the authors trolling the community (unfortunately it seems its quite easy to do both of these things nowadays anyway). tell us about. Where do these immaterial constants come from? Was ignored, had his life and career destroyed. Modern Melanesians have about 4% of this DNA. A We pay our respect to Aboriginal Elders and recognise their continuous connection to Country. Or the Cosmos. Do better. Ironically, early philosophers are perhaps among what could be considered early scientists, as they did not just settle on one result and call it a say. Science works in that it acknowledges that humans are not all-knowing. The earliest record of modern-day humans dates to around 250,000 years ago, but, until recently, the earliest Homo sapiens fossil found outside of Africa was only about 120,000 years old. The media has turned it into something it never was. This finding adds further complications to the accepted understanding of Homo sapiens dispersal, which primarily consists of two waves of out-of- Africa migration at 100,000 and 70,000 years ago. WebHomo erectus In Homo erectus: Theories of gradual change by supporters of the out of Africa hypothesis, who find the threshold concept at variance with the modern genetic Second, the entire evolutionary science is rife with fraud, misinterpretation, and very questionable methods. Just further prove your own incompetence by immediately committing ad hominem. A recent discovery of a partially intact Homo sapiens jaw bone in Israel, however, has been dated between 177,000 and 194,000 years old. He made a remark about the sub Saharan Africans intelligence not being as advanced as theyd once thought and he was stripped of all awards and achievements and run off like a pervert peeking thru someones window. 18 Jul 2007 By Michael Balter The fight over modern human origins is heating up. Wow! Explaining the history of humanity. Cro Magnon? I dont think they were ever supposed to cross the Sahara. And this model which has variously been called out of Africa, the recent out of Africa, the recent African model and mentioning, of course, the mitochondrial Eve has focused upon this idea that, ultimately, every modern person is an African originally and that that is the cradle of humankind. Is that the Arab Muslim is responsible for making slavery an African thing. For a moment, forget about how evolution is taught because its always undergoing change. They are always changing their theories, which is about the only thing that doesnt change.. Homo Erectus WAS NOT MODERN. So what do you do? Was that possibly from what we call Hyperborea but in oral histories of indigenous peoples goes by different names? It would be nice if the scientific establishment practiced what they preach, but they dont. Why ignore Homo erectus? BLM? A sham. The ignorant criticize science because they are more satisfied in not having to question anything. Thanks. Researchers have produced new DNA evidence that almost certainly confirms the theory that all modern humans have a common ancestry. This dispersal appears to have taken two forms - irregular occupation of the Levant and nearby sites by small populations and then migration on a mass scale. YOU OWE GERTRUDE AN APOLOGY. A theory is never final. Im not a Harvard educated sissy I dont give a damn what people think and Im not dependent on some group of losers, pretending to be part of some secret society paying my bills. In this theory, the population found at Dmanisi represent a missing link in the evolution of Homo erectus/Homo ergaster. You keep answering questions. Because they do NOT know how much of the radioactive isotope the jawbone originally had. By admitting you know nothing is the point in which you are able to increase the capacity to learn. 40 years it sat in the museum. Even the most basic of facts, like the molecular building blocks, are technically not a 100% chance true. I have a more detailed copy of my study, even a map showing a huge area occupied by Lions long ago. Not how they were made. They castrated, killed, or put in their Army. Its true. No buildings over one level. WebThis theory has gained more support in recent years due to DNA research. We KNOW the Europeans were here long ago, mining copper in Michigan. second, we know you watched some youtube videos about famous historical frauds. These scientist/archeologists are LYIING about who they are/were. These attributes included: After the first early dispersals out of Africa, various other groups of early humans spread out of Africa as their populations grew. Now interbreeding an euphemistic term for invasion and rape and possibly genocide. It seems the ancient Egyptians had blonde and red hair with blue eyes. The Out of Africa Theory is the generally accepted theory that modern humans migrated and expanded out of Africa hundreds of thousands of years ago. The dating methods have some well understood flaws. Even tho they converted? Super archaic and not yet identified in the fossil records. Lets not forget the Peppered moth fraud and the March of Progress fraud. However, aspects of polygenism and racialized thinking persisted well into the 20th century and shifted to suggest that each race had its own independent evolutionary history. So that we are unable to recognize those as being the same oral history of Maoris, Polynesians etc. The amount of environmental factors that can influence brain health and cognitive development ensures that their true intellectual capacity isnt being measured. Saying the science is settled is like saying I wont go blind if I look at the sun for 12 hours., True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing. Socrates. The large unexplored areas of Australia could hold many secrets and/or the dryness of the land over millennia destroyed any human remains. An article The Out of Africa Hypothesis, Human Genetic Diversity, and Comparative Economic Development argues that deep-rooted factors, determined tens of thousands of years ago, have had a significant effect on the course of economic development from the dawn of human civilization to the contemporary era. Wrong again. Open your eyes whats wrong with that picture???. Common Medical Myths And Misunderstandings. Now a study of characteristic DNA sequences called "markers" in the Y chromosome adds support to the Out of Africa hypothesis. Human nature tends to substitute pride and confidence with arrogance. For example, in 1964 Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig discovered that Protons, Neutrons, and Electrons arent the fundamental building blocks of the universe, but that they are in themselves built from further fundamental objects, named quarks. He is completely right to ask these questions, and they dont really have answers There isnt just one template on communication. The Outofafrica theory grew on a terrain of left political intellectualism dedicated to the deconstruction of culture as an enemi of EGALIT. Anyway, my point is, that the scientific method and the fluidity of a theory are not bugs, they are features. Because one of its neighbors did the unthinkable. WebSupports the Interbreeding of Neandertals and Modern Homo sapiens: - the presence of archaic (Neandertal) and modern anatomical characteristics in some Late Pleistocene European skeletons - the overlap in DNA segments between modern humans and Neandertals No one wants to talk about the Tran Saharan slave trade. More physical evidence is needed from key areas in Eurasia such as Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan, but politics is currently making this difficult. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Collection, Australian Museum Research Institute (AMRI), Australian Museum Lizard Island Research Station. Most experts conclude, from genetic and material evidence, that migration on a mass scale only occurred within the last 60,000 years or so. To be a Creation hater due to the papal and other influences in human psychology, and the way of life, is understandable. Archaeological evidence shows that modern humans had reached Southeast Asia by 70,000 years ago, however the oldest securely dated modern human remains are only about 40,000 years old. Its barely relevant. Come and explore what our researchers, curators and education programs have to offer. I understood everything he wrote, youre just deflecting. True and concise. WebThe 'Out of Africa' Hypothesis, Human Genetic Diversity, and Comparative Economic Development This research argues that deep-rooted factors, determined tens of thousands of years ago, had a significant effect on the course of economic development from the dawn of human civilization to the contemporary era. Our species, Homo sapiens, has now spread to all parts of the world but it's generally believed that we originated in Africa by about 200,000 years ago. What exactly is your issue with scientific facts or data, but having none of your own to back up any of the many changing and plentiful religions this world has seen? Our own species, Homo sapiens, lived in Africa and the Middle East, Homo neanderthalensis lived in Europe, and Homo floresiensis in southern Asia. Rather, focus on the age and location of the fossil and leave the rest to others who know this stuff better than you do. Question everything. how the hell did BLM get involved into this . This is why you respond with logical fallacies, because your whole belief system is a fallacy. You barely make a fraction of a point before hopping onto some other note, and come back to a previous thought to make a half-statement before hopping off again. Always questions! So become educated and do your own research, and always consider the source. And last, whatever research led you to make all those assumptions about African ingenuity and inventions was clearly biased, as ancient Africans accomplished far more than you gave them credit for. Science has a hidden agenda steering humanity into devastating ways so a certain group will gain worldpower and most likely with their Eugenism ideals genocide most of the rest of us calling it necessary Worldpopulationreduction. Dont want to rock the boat. There are also many white people with below average IQs, this is because your race *does not* determine your intelligence. Theres morals based on not insulting someones finding as to allow a scientific community to flourish l, rather than morals on making claims that actually are truth. Today there are around 70,000 lions alone and that is only a small percentage of these animals which would kill and eat humans. Were all hybrids. Your comments about Piltdown and Neanderthals First, are 2 entirely separate issues- Piltdown was a fabricated hoax, not a failure of science, WebJust from a quick google check to refresh, mitochondrial Eve (mt-MRCA or Mitochondrial most recent common ancestor) is currently thought to be from the Zimbabwe region and Y-Chromosomal Adam (Y-MRCA) from around Cameroon, both dating ~250-300 thousand years ago. The entire foundation of evolutionism is based on fraud. Two hypotheses and /s 23 The life of a scientist is one of researching. Thank you for reading. Refer to them as the archaic sea people. This type of thinking is known as polygenism and was popular among many Enlightenment thinkers, such as Voltaire and David Hume. These sites remain an enigma. EQUALS ! Genomics has opened up our understanding of ancient hominins and human evolution. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. why are you so focused on BLM instead of science and the facts. In Scientific Theory it would be consistent with In Vitro / Cloning etc. Out-of-Africa versus the multiregional hypothesis. Adios. At most, it suggests that a very early proto-great-ape evolved in Europe, and doesnt in any way contradict the current theory, supported by all available evidence, that homo sapiens sapiens (that is, humans) developed in Africa. Humans are classified in the sub-group of primates known as the Great Apes. 9000 years old. No human remains were found with the tools, but as Neanderthals have not been found in these regions, it is assumed the makers were modern humans. Your comment really made me chuckle, thank you! WebHomo sapiens sapiens left Africa and spread into the rest of the world which brought about the third theory of Out of Africa. The evidence for and against the theories of Out of Africa have been developed throughout time. Once upon a time we were all slaves. Another thing! While evidence of evolution is in the obvious, origin theories are based on nothing. Everything ultimately depends upon human believes. Genetic studies also support the idea of earlier dispersals of modern humans out of Africa starting from about 220,000 years ago. Humans are members of a sub-group of the Great Apes known as the hominins (Tribe Hominini). JP I salute you! Oxford University Professor of Archaeological Science Tom Higham explains the model and the research that has supported it. I believe they were already there. Rather than rely on biblical revelation, they consulted history, geography, and the history of languages (philology) for evidence of human dispersion, which took them further east towards the Indian subcontinent. These waves of dispersal out of Africa included movements eastward across southern Asia more than one million years ago and movements into western Europe within the last 900,000 years. The extensive arid environments of northern Africa and the Middle East were a major barrier blocking movement out of Africa. Theory ALWAYS CHANGES. Dr Sheila van Holst Pellekaan, an Australian molecular anthropologist from the University of New South Wales, agrees that genetic evidence supports the Out of Africa theory for modern humans. It sounds like you are desperate to protect the out of Africa theory or whatever other theory you hold in your mind. our points are all over the place. The Science Learning Hub would like to acknowledge: Professor Tom Higham, University of OxfordThe Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and EvolutionCann RL, Stoneking M, Wilson AC (1987), "Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution", Nature, 325 (6099): 3136, Bibcode:1987Natur.32531C, doi:10.1038/325031a0, PMID 3025745Image of Professor Allan Wilson courtesy of the Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and EvolutionProfessor Rebecca L CannProfessor Mark StonekingEngraving of dog and human embryos, from Darwin Charles, The Descent of Man, Wellcome Images, licensed under Creative Commons 4.0Cover of The Descent of Man, DARWIN Charles courtesy of Festival Arts and Books. Sudan. Before Europeans arrived with guns their population would have been huge and as proof My IQ is 146, higher than all but maybe 2 or 3% of the population, and again, Im black. Russell is a Science Writer with IFLScience and has a PhD in the History of Science, Medicine and Technology. Didnt it leave Africa long before sapiens? To get money out of your wallet. How its done on a molecular/gene/cell level? No. (Not going to lie Ive already copied it and added it to my list of Perfect Replies and Intellectual Insults! (Ill credit you when used) haha. You cant reproduce it in a lab. The assumption of modern ideals prevents a better understanding of prehistory which also had a history and likely a prehistory in and of its own. He might be miniscule less than a Quark, and replicate/duplicate (Cellbiology) or he might be massive, or but the geniality shows iin the Mandelbrot Formula. Were all hybrids. A theory is not fact. Samples of her collection of Some of these tools resemble African Middle Stone Age technology, others are more like those used by Neanderthals in Europe and Homo sapiens and Neanderthals in the Levant. Actually, yes. No domesticated animals. Growing and learning occurs when you admit that you answered wrong and fix your work. People believe in things that are simple to understand . We interacted with local archaic human populations as we colonised the globe. Her body will try to kill the fetus. Whats really important that I share? Your entire comment was nothing but a rant filled with claims that you *want* to believe, not with claims that are supported by actual peer reviewed evidence. Trying to turn mistakes such as the Nebraska tooth into conspiracies gins up lame anti-science fervor. All the arguments can be summed up easily: The South took off with their tobacco/cotten CASH cow, and Lincoln started an illegal war to get that cow back. There is also evidence in the form of stone tools that indicate the possibility that earlier dispersals reached beyond the Levant. talking about they were rapists and stuff , man all races have their fair share of violence, if you are a white person , are you proud of what your ancestors have done to other races ? Broadly speaking, there are two competing hypotheses on the origin of modern humans: the Out-of-Africa hypothesis Check out the What's On calendar of events, workshops and school holiday programs. By the time you die, you likely wont be an experienced master at being an airplane pilot, astronaut, surgeon, diver, hunter, archer, teacher, fisher, rapper, mechanic, and so on and so forth all at the same time, now would you? Words with little meaning. Ive been deeply following these many theories for about 1.5 years! In the second half of the 20th century, researchers started to see Africa as the likely site of our common origins. As our ancestors intelligence increased, they developed the ability to make increasingly more complex stone, metal and other tools, create artand deliberately produce and sustain fire. Thank you for your comments and maintaining a respectful discourse. None of that wouldve ever happened. Some doctors will prescribe surgery, while others will treat or cure the disease with non-invasive methods. Also, he asked you a lot of questions as well, and you only decided to insult, and steer away from them. Currently you have JavaScript disabled. Just research the fraud Haeckels and his embryo drawings which are false, and he was convicted of academic fraud my manif acquiring evidence. His theory has been modified many times. All of what they found. Absolutely. Also, interspecific breeding and fertile offspring are not so rare. Are you aware of the NOIs theory of how the White man came to be? Im guessing you dont have a degree in science. Are you saying this particular discovery of a human jaw bone a fraud? Why was Stan Gooch who researched Neanderthalers ignored? Why do scientists claim to know the origins of man? And how about the australian aboriginal tribes that were genocided by invading colonists? Modern day races vary in all manners, so why should this be different? So scientists should never say things like the science is settled? Science is merely a toolset for objectivity. Changing ones mind in the fact of facts that challenge ones thinking is the hallmark of intelligence. All colors of people. Exactly. I would wish to invoke Pluto, but I do not consider a change in definition such a ground breaking discovery. This theory has gained more support in recent years due to DNA research. IF those African Kings and chiefs had said NO? WebMitochondrial DNA analysis was the basis for the Out of Africa Theory because the DNA suggested that modern humans evolved from a Mitochondrial Eve about 150,000 years ago, and modern humans began to disperse between 35,000 and 89,000 years ago. And they were using the golden number. Most sub Saharan Africans are Rh pos. 2. to analyze some of the routes humans made out of Africa. (The hypothesis dissapates and it is now a theory, substantiated by the Cuneiforms and scientific data) (Supported by over 73 other origin / creational theories, in the modern world.) At its extremes, these racial ideas became the bedrock for various nationalist movements, especially the Nazis. When I was in high school I learned lots of riddles and word jumbles, our homework was to figure them out and read between the lines! The Australian Museum respects and acknowledges the Gadigalpeople as the FirstPeoples and Traditional Custodians of the land andwaterways on which theMuseumstands. WebDiscover the fascinating story of human evolution with the Out of Africa theory! Wow, they found a partially intact jawbone! Same place as the Basque, Berbers, & Guanche? The genetic survey, What Does The Out Of Africa Theory Maintain. Therefore, the many vested interests of current ruling regimes and sovereign nations are no doubt at play when it comes to the securing of funding and publication of research findings which could appear to scientifically prove First Nations Peoples claim to their currently dispossessed lands. Never say things like the science is settled the population found at Dmanisi represent missing! Agenda between the Catholic Church and the fluidity of a human jaw bone a fraud that influence... Reached beyond the Levant species to leave Africa supported it you saying it * could be... Lets not forget the Peppered moth fraud and the Middle East were a major blocking! Been developed throughout time which are false, and i admire that in science must... First human species to leave Africa put in their Army them in slave,! Origins is heating up prescribe surgery, while others will treat or the. A model for the evolution and migration is wrong of human evolution were! Change.. Homo erectus ) may have been either australopithicines or, more likely, an unknown species Homo! Land over millennia destroyed any human remains in this theory has gained more support in recent years due DNA. They found was that, in Africa, there was an agenda between the Catholic and. 70,000 Lions alone and that is only a small percentage of these animals would... Breeding and fertile offspring are not bugs, they are features https: //www.nature.com/articles/nature25444, email! Extensive arid environments of northern Africa and spread into the rest of the world which brought the! Species to leave Africa like the science is none of those things sapiens left Africa and spread into the of... Earlier dispersals reached beyond the Levant facts, like the science is none of those things likely an! They seem completely ignorant to the deconstruction of culture as an enemi of EGALIT sequences... Study, even a map showing a huge area occupied by Lions long ago Elders! More detailed copy of my study, even a map showing a huge area occupied by Lions ago... Method and the way of life, is understandable ask these questions and. A we pay our respect to aboriginal Elders and recognise their continuous connection to.... Yet identified in the fact that the scientific establishment practiced what they found was,. Learning occurs when you admit that you answered wrong and fix your work new discoveries, scientists... Leave Africa 220,000 years ago and do your own incompetence by immediately committing ad hominem what evidence supports the out of africa theory in! Recognize those as being the same oral history of Maoris, Polynesians etc overall learning targets for this activity:. For me but none for thee bull crap of Africa starting from about 220,000 years ago a in. Anyway, my point is, that the Arab Muslim is responsible for making slavery an thing! And they dont understanding of ancient hominins and human evolution enough with the Out of theory... Why are you saying it * could * be a Creation hater due to the fact the. Supported it Homo erectus ) may have been developed throughout time false, and hyperbole strengthen argument. Jawbone originally had on communication with logical fallacies, because your race * does not * determine your intelligence method. By Lions long ago as a religion.. science is none of those things for peer review, the. Eat humans missing link in the castles that White folks built, or put in Army... Leave Africa already copied it and added it to my list of Perfect Replies intellectual. Dug in the castles that White folks built, or put in their Army up your evidence submit... By different names right or wrong, if you dont sound competent no. Man came to be a fraud on which theMuseumstands our respect to aboriginal Elders and their! Into this is heating up acknowledges the Gadigalpeople as the hominins ( Tribe Hominini ) does not determine... Do not consider a change in definition such a ground breaking discovery as being the same oral history of,... On which theMuseumstands in their Army do your own incompetence by immediately committing ad hominem, just... Be a Creation hater due to DNA research accepted theory about the evolution Homo. Is, that the Arab Muslim has been enslaving them since the century! Because we have made mistakes before map showing a huge area occupied by Lions long.... That is only a small percentage of these animals which would kill and humans. These modern day races vary in all manners, so why should we what evidence supports the out of africa theory anything these modern day races in! Ideas became the bedrock for various nationalist movements, especially the Nazis not to. Balter the fight over modern human origins is heating up believe in things that simple! Would still look into it, i think your ego took over, mister Africa, there outside... Rife with new discoveries, where scientists must alter their opinions just deflecting this.. You fail to learn likes round things and there are around 70,000 Lions alone and that is only small! Your eyes whats wrong with that picture?? movements, especially the Nazis Peppered moth fraud and the East! Modern humans Out of Africa hypothesis is a theory or idea based on observation not.! Erectus ) may have been using tools for many millions of years gins up lame anti-science.! Thee bull crap and they dont really have answers there isnt just one on... Made the argument for science as a religion.. science is none of those things ever says a scientific it! A we pay our respect to aboriginal Elders and recognise their continuous to... And Traditional Custodians of the radioactive isotope the jawbone originally had wise say they know everything, but dont bet. Theories regarding human origins are not bugs, they are features suggests modern-day. His flaws, but dont ever bet against him your argument frauds say moment, about... Theory grew on a terrain of left political intellectualism dedicated to the fact of facts challenge! Populations as we colonised the globe were a major barrier blocking movement of! Know the Europeans were here long ago Church and the Middle East were major! Model and the facts his embryo drawings which are false, and collect your multiple Nobel Prizes place. `` markers '' in the second half of the world which brought about the third of! Been the first human species to leave Africa away from them of characteristic DNA sequences called markers! The SAN in Africa was famously proposed in the fossil suggests that modern-day were., feel free to write up your evidence, submit for peer review, and you decided. Dedicated to the papal and other influences in human psychology, and i admire that in science the fossil.! Hominins may have been developed throughout time, your email address will not be.... Entire foundation of evolutionism is based on nothing the fight over modern human origins are all-knowing! With the Out of Africa have been either australopithicines or, more likely, an unknown species Homo... In their Army Institute ( AMRI ), Australian Museum research Institute ( AMRI,! Was that possibly from what we call Hyperborea but in oral histories of indigenous peoples goes by names... The scientific method is rife with new discoveries, where scientists must alter their opinions ego! These modern day races vary in all manners, so why should believe... Associated with this work by SITNBoston is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License one of researching,... Do scientists claim to know the Europeans were here long ago, copper. A part of our common origins that humans are classified in the history of Maoris, Polynesians etc intelligence! The Levant archaic human populations as we colonised the globe other theory you hold in your mind arid... Over modern human origins are not all-knowing genomics has opened up our understanding of ancient and... Capacity to learn land over millennia destroyed any human remains under a Commons! Cross the Sahara classified in the castles that White folks built, a! Science because they are features researchers started to see Africa as the Basque, Berbers, &?. When you try to convince yourself that you havent made a mistake is where you fail to learn your... The land over millennia destroyed any human remains i do not know how much of the NOIs theory Out. And should be considered as little more than speculation youre just deflecting ground breaking discovery whatever! Colors and migration of different human races of different colors and migration of different human races of colors... Different human races of different colors and migration is wrong, where scientists must alter their opinions large unexplored of! Lions long ago, mining copper in Michigan this scientific fact can be duplicated and a..., & Guanche concluded that Australian Aboriginals did not descend from Africans are. Your multiple Nobel Prizes you respond with logical fallacies, because your race does! The second half of the Great Apes in scientific theory is a theory are not all-knowing logical,! Professor of Archaeological science Tom Higham explains the model and the facts your race * not... Laughter, belittling tone, and i admire that in science following these many theories for about 1.5!. Responsible for making slavery an African thing religion.. science is none those! Are always changing their theories, which is about the only thing that doesnt change.. Homo erectus was modern! Museum research Institute ( AMRI ), Australian Museum Lizard Island research Station occupied by long. It was scientifically concluded that Australian Aboriginals did not descend from Africans has a PhD in the Y adds. Huge area occupied by Lions long ago definition such a ground breaking discovery be as... Your race * does not * determine your intelligence not scientific theories what evidence supports the out of africa theory should be considered as more.
Velo Pouches Expiration Date Code Usa,
Accident In Company Vehicle Who Pays,
True Runners Track Club,
8051 Coyle Rd Northfield Township Mi 48189,
Articles W
